![]() |
| Richard Scarry, Photo retrieved from Famousauthors.org |
His father, a successful business man, hoped that Scarry
would attend an Ivy League college and eventually follow in his footsteps.
Without the scholastic strength or intrinsic desire to go a school of such
intensity, Scarry spent a year at a Boston business school. No happier there
than he had been in primary and high school, he transferred to the Boston
Museum School of Fine Arts. Finally able to focus on developing his artistic
talents, Scarry found joy. In 1942, one year shy of graduation, however, he was
drafted into the American forces, effectively ending his formal art education.
When the army asked his profession, Scarry professed
himself an artist. It seemed to make no difference, though, as he was sent to
radio repair school. His dismay was evident. “He failed the exam miserably…
earning the unheard-of lowest score in the history of the class: minus
thirteen” (Richard Scarry, n.d.). His commanding officer realized that allowing
Scarry to repair radios would be a disaster in the making, so he reassigned him
to a much more palatable position: artist. His position quickly grew and he
became the “military’s ‘art director’” (Richard Scarry, n.d.), in charge of
designing propaganda and support messages, as well as disseminating news
updates.
Scarry loved the position and his ensuing role as “editor
and writer of Publications for the Information and Morale Services Section of
the Allied Force Headquarters” (Richard Scarry, n.d.). He was not only able to
utilize his creativity, but was given the opportunity to travel around the
world. Professional circumstances could not have been better for a man who
thrived on movement and activity.
With such experience under his belt, Scarry had no
problem finding illustration jobs after the war—with Little Golden Books.
Scarry’s portfolio, filled with “cartoonish human characters” capture the
imaginations of executives at Little Golden Books and in 1948, they offered him
a very lucrative, one year contract for $4800 (Richard Scarry, n.d.). Over the
next decade, his characters evolved into the zany, hard-working, madcap, often
accident-prone residents of the halcyon town of Busytown that would catapult
him into children’s literature history.
![]() |
| Photo retrieved from https://thephoenixremix.wordpress.com |
![]() |
| Photo credit: Alan Taylor |
While young children continued to
adore his books and illustrations, a simmering backlash erupted around 1970.
Society started pinpointing Scarry’s illustrations as sexist and racially
stereotyped. “Feminists accused him of being a misogynist because his female
characters wore dresses and were mainly housewives” (Avignon, 2012). Given the society in which he was raised, in
which women’s roles were very much relegated to the home, the fact Scarry put
dresses on the animal cooking dinner was culturally accurate. He stated on
several occasions that all his characters are animals with no particular
gender, so a truck driver wearing trousers and a shirt could very well be
female (Lynch, 1998). “Most of the women characters dressed just like men anyway”, he
maintained. (Richard Scarry, n.d.) The irony wasn’t lost on him, as he also
“pointed out that the feminist movement itself thought men and women should
dress in the same manner” (Avignon, 2012).
![]() | |
|
![]() |
| Photo retrieved from: Mrs. Little.com |
Scarry’s goal had been to educate children with images of a society they could relate to and this backlash helped him recognized that in order to sell books, in order to reach his audience, in order to give children new and innovative ways in which to learn, he would have update his characters, their dress, their professions and their Busy World society. Women, ironically, were the primary caretakers of his intended audience and in order to keep them buying his books for their children, he would have to bend to their pressure. It wasn’t about the profit for Scarry; it was about the children. He once said that it is “‘a precious thing to be communicating to children, helping them discover the gift of language and thought. I’m happy to be doing it’” (Richard Scarry, 2010).
















